ImageFirst News

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Change is Upon Us: The Battle of LEDs vs Florescent Lamps

The signage world has been hit with a thunderous storm of a constantly evolving technology. Over the past couple years, this storm has grown into an everyday occurrence.


When I first entered the sig­nage indus­try eight years ago, jobs with LED’s were few and far between. Ven­dors lists were small, along with cus­tomers trust in an expen­sive and fair­ly unproven tech­nol­o­gy. Jobs call­ing for the use of LEDs were fun and excit­ing but always left with a lit­tle uncer­tain­ty of it being a suc­cess. Fast for­ward to 2013, the shop is full with jobs using LEDs, more and more quote requests have LEDs in the spec­i­fi­ca­tions. Ven­dor lists and the range of prod­ucts have become a mile long. Change is here! I want to quick­ly hit the main sell­ing” points for the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion of this change, focus­ing on the pure cost sav­ings that LEDs pro­vide to the end user.

LED Ener­gy Savings

The most obvi­ous rea­son for LEDs is the lit­tle ener­gy con­sump­tion need­ed to pow­er them ver­sus flu­o­res­cent lamp­ing. In today’s econ­o­my end users are becom­ing more and more aware of the sav­ings LEDs pro­vide over the life­time of the sign.

For com­par­i­son, using a dou­ble faced cab­i­net 48” x 72” x 12” in depth, using US LED Tan­dem series (T2-14-24-4W) White LEDs @ 120 volts. This par­tic­u­lar prod­uct was devel­oped by US LED, Ltd. to be an alter­nate for flu­o­res­cent lamps. The same lay­out stan­dards apply for the Tandems that one would fol­low for flu­o­res­cent lamps. The pow­er con­sump­tion for­mu­la I will use over a one year time frame is: $0.10 Kw per hr for 12 hours per day. The total con­sump­tion bill for that year will be $73.58 for LEDs vs $261.22 for flu­o­res­cents. The con­sump­tion sav­ing would be $187.64!

LED Cost Savings

The next piece of the puz­zle for fig­ur­ing out cost sav­ings comes with the longevi­ty of LEDs vs flu­o­res­cents. A typ­i­cal LED prod­uct will last on aver­age 5-7 years com­pared to 18 months for flu­o­res­cent lamps and bal­lasts. So it’s obvi­ous that you will occur mul­ti­ple main­te­nance fees for flu­o­res­cents over the life­time of the sign. A typ­i­cal ser­vice call to replace both lamps and bal­last will run around $1,500 per trip, for a year­ly aver­age of $1050 in main­te­nance vs $0 per year for a LED illu­mi­nat­ed sign.

Look­ing Past Upfront Costs to Longterm Savings

Last­ly and typ­i­cal­ly the major hur­dle to pur­chas­ing LEDs are the upfront costs. This how­ev­er can eas­i­ly be over­come when the pre­vi­ous two para­graphs are put in front of the end user. Of course every cus­tomer will have a bud­get and at times it’s dif­fi­cult to push added costs up front. For the above sig­nage para­me­ters, the prod­uct invest­ment for LED illu­mi­na­tion will be rough­ly $800 more than flu­o­res­cents (this is based on prod­uct only). The labor aspect of installing US LED Tandems is vir­tu­al­ly the same due to the inno­v­a­tive design of the product.

So the final tal­ly for annu­al sav­ings equal near­ly $1,200 when choos­ing LED vs flu­o­res­cents. This will put a sim­ple pay­back of invest­ment of 0.65 years in this par­tic­u­lar case. I do acknowl­edge that every sig­nage solu­tion is dif­fer­ent and num­bers will vary but it is dif­fi­cult to argue against LED illu­mi­na­tion. My goal with this arti­cle is to sim­pli­fy the sav­ings break­down and also to help pro­vide a guide to the best sig­nage solu­tion possible.

By Ryan Hudnut
Pro­duc­tion Manager/​Designer